Monday, April 29, 2013

CPS Takes Baby After Parents Seek Second Medical Opinion...

CPS Takes Baby After Parents Seek Second Medical Opinion

"The right to choose what’s best for your own child is a speck fading gradually in the rear view mirror, and as Sarah at the Healthy Home Economist correctly surmised, the day has come where walking through hospital doors means immediately surrendering your right to dictate what’s best medically for your child."


A Sacramento couple is without their 5 month old baby after Child Protective Services sent in the police to forcibly remove the child from their care.
A hearing is scheduled for Monday, April 29, 2013 on the incident which was triggered when Anna Nikolayev and her husband Alex took baby Sammy out of Sutter Memorial Hospital and sought a second opinion at Kaiser Permanente, a rival hospital, for Sammy’s flu-like symptoms.

Anna and Alex were concerned about the quality of care baby Sammy was receiving at Sutter where he was admitted nearly two weeks ago. At one point, Anna questioned the antibiotics Sammy was being given and was alarmed that the nurse administering the treatment didn’t know why the child was receiving them. Anna claims that a doctor later said that Sammy should not have been receiving the medication.
When doctors began discussing the possibility of heart surgery, the parents decided to leave without a proper discharge in order to have the child examined elsewhere.
“If we got the one mistake after another, I don’t want to have my baby have surgery in the hospital where I don’t feel safe,” Anna said.
She added, ”We went from one hospital to another. We just wanted to be safe, that he is in good hands.”
While at Kaiser Permanente, the police showed up at the request of Sutter. The police told the parents that staff at Sutter had told them that the child was in such a bad state that, as Anna put it, “they thought that this baby is dying on our arms.”
After the police saw that baby Sammy was fine and examined medical records that clearly stated that Sammy was clinically safe to go home, they left.
The attending doctor at Kaiser said, “I do not have concern for the safety of the child at home with his parents.”
The next day, police came to Alex and Anna’s home.
Alex met them outside and was slammed against the wall and pushed to the ground.
His keys to the home were forcibly removed from him and the police entered the house to take the baby.
Anna’s home video of the incident shows police entering the home.
“I’m going to grab your baby, and don’t resist, and don’t fight me ok?” a Sacramento police officer is heard saying in the video.
News10 of Sacramento spoke with police on the situation and were told to talk to Child Protective Services. CPS said little about the case, only saying on Thursday, April 27 that the child was taken due to severe neglect. CPS spokesperson Laura McCasland said, ”We conduct a risk assessment of the child’s safety and rely heavily on the direction of health care providers.”
No additional details were provided.
Sammy is currently in “protective custody” at Sutter Memorial Hospital. Hospital officials refused to comment saying the case was with CPS and law enforcement and they would have to deliver a statement.
Alex sums up the situation well.
“It seems like parents have no right whatsoever,” he said.
Indeed.
Parents are increasingly becoming irrelevant when it comes to decisions regarding their children’s medical care. Jodi and Scott Ferris experienced a similar traumatic event when they questioned the Hep B vaccination for their baby at Penn State Hershey Medical Center. Their baby was also taken by CPS.
The moral of this story? Tick off doctors and nurses at a hospital and they could very well sic CPS on you – with police breaking down your door in short order.
Think long and hard before taking your children to the hospital my friends. Once you go through that door, the medical decisions about your child are no longer within your control.

Sunday, April 28, 2013

"God beholds you individually, whoever you are. ...

27 April 2013

Weekend Reading

"God beholds you individually, whoever you are. He calls you by your name. He sees you and understands you, as He made you. He knows what is in you, all your own peculiar feelings and thoughts, your dispositions and likings, your strength, your weakness.

He views you in your day of rejoicing, and your day of sorrow. He sympathises in your hopes and your temptations. He interests Himself in all your anxieties and remembrances, all the rising and failings of your spirit. He has numbered the very hairs of your head and the height of your stature.

He compasses you round and bears you in His arms; He takes you up and sets you down. He notes your very countenance, whether smiling or in tears, whether healthful or sickly. He looks tenderly upon your hands and your feet; He hears your voice, the beating of your heart, and your very breathing.

You do not love yourself better than He loves you. You cannot shrink from pain more than He dislikes your bearing it; and if He puts it on you, it is as you would put it on yourself, if you would be wise, for a greater good afterwards....

God has created you to do Him some definite service; He has committed some work to you which He has not committed to another. You have your mission -- you may never know it in this life but you shall be told it in the next.

You are a link in a chain, a bond of connection between persons. He has not created you for naught. You shall do good, you shall do His work. You shall be an angel of peace, a preacher of truth in your own place while not intending it if you do but keep His commandments.

Therefore I will trust Him. Whatever I am, I can never be thrown away. If I am in sickness, my sickness may serve Him; in perplexity, my perplexity may serve Him. If I am in sorrow, my sorrow may serve Him. He does nothing in vain. He knows what He is about.

He may take away my friends. He may throw me among strangers. He may make me feel desolate, make my spirits sink, hide my future from me -- still He knows what He is about."

John Henry Newman

The Elites Frightening Plan To Control The Masses

The Elites Frightening Plan To Control The Masses
Today legendary trader Jim Sinclair told King World News that the elites plan to use the coming financial chaos and destruction to control the masses. Sinclair spoke about the “Great Unwind,” what this means for gold, and how investors can protect themselves from what is in front of us. Below is what Sinclair, who was once called on by former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker to assist during a Wall Street crisis, had to say in this remarkable interview.



Sinclair: “The enormous violence in the markets is obscuring a very clear message. The message from Cyprus, that has also been written in various white papers and signed by central banks, the FDIC, Bank of England, and the BIS, is to get out of the system.

What happens to readers around the world is of primary importance to King World News and to myself. The meetings that I have already had, and future meetings still to take place around the world, have been for the purpose of keeping investors from having large portions of their wealth destroyed or stolen from them.


People have to understand that going forward large deposits by ‘non-insiders’ are no longer going to be permitted. The goal of this pre-arranged wealth destruction is to equalize the ‘new rich’ and the ‘upper middle-class.’ Those not on the inside, with the right families and the right companies, are not going to be tolerated in the ‘New Paradigm’ of currency and metal that we are now moving into.

So the only means of being able to protect yourself will be to understand the answer to the question, ‘What is the final end game for the most powerful families that are in fact running countries and markets?’....

Monday, April 8, 2013

Conflict Erupts As Elites Plan More Wealth Destruction

Conflict Erupts As Elites Plan More Wealth Destruction


Today Jim Sinclair warned King World News that conflict has now erupted between Western central planners as the elites have planned further wealth destruction. Sinclair also cautioned that people in the US and Canada will be shocked when their wealth is stolen. Below is what Sinclair, who was once called on by former Fed Chairman Paul Volcker to assist during a Wall Street crisis, had to say in this remarkable interview.

<![CDATA[//><!]]>
-->

<![CDATA[//><!]]>
-->Sinclair: “How in the world can Lagarde say that Cyprus is a one-off? The spreading of bail-in being written into Canadian law, New Zealand law, as well as in other countries, tends to indicate that what has been done in Cyprus is in fact a test case for further application. If it wasn’t, it was an economic act of war by Europe against Russia.”
 

Eric KIng: “Jim, when you see that being written into law in countries elsewhere, they are not setting that up for no reason.”

 

Sinclair: “No. They are not writing that in because some junior clerk supports the approach. When countries write things into legal documents it passes legal review. So the possibility of that being a mistake is nil....

 

Continue reading the Jim Sinclair interview below...

 

Eric King: “So when Lagarde and others are all coming out on the wire today and saying Cyprus isn’t a template, they are all lying?”

 

Sinclair: “Yes. Today the European Union and Monetary Commissioner Olli Rehn also said the Cyprus model can be completely ruled out and it will never considered again. But if it isn’t an indication, why is this model being picked up in so many other countries?

 

 

We do know that Bernanke and Draghi took exception to what Lagarde and the IMF orchestrated in Cyprus, there is no question about that. The bottom line here is that Lagarde and the Dutch Finance Minister let the Cyprus model out of the bag too early, and what it has created is extreme fear on the part of depositors which could turn into chaos.

 

Bernanke and Draghi also took exception when the Dutch Finance Minister declared the action in Cyprus to be a template for further use. The statement by Lagarde and others today is simply a follow-through of the Dutch Finance Minister’s backpedal. Both Bernanke and Draghi were upset because this template was brought to light in a situation which did not merit it.

 

 

In truth, you can’t use Cyprus as the template. If the major savings of the citizens of industrialized nations are subject to any degree of confiscation, it will completely destroy the confidence that has been created at the cost of trillions of dollars. This is the feeling that general depositors are safe. If they reverse that, this whole thing will implode.”

 

Eric King: “Jim, when you say, ‘implode,’ can you give readers around the world an idea of what we would see?”

 

Sinclair: “What you would see is depositors withdrawing their money from every bank they can. In essence this would be the mother of all bank runs. They would take their money out of the system. But nobody in their right mind will maintain significant deposits in light of the possibility of confiscation.

 

So central planners are now between a rock and a hard place. Cyprus has placed us into a lack of definition. What Mrs. Lagarde and others are attempting to do right now is make this situation go away.”

 

Eric King: “This was from John Embry earlier today in his KWN interview: ‘You can’t create more and more debt, which is required to get economic activity moving forward at a decent pace. They will try, but ultimately it will reflect itself in inflation. So what we potentially face is the first global move toward hyperinflation in world history.’ John believes this move to create velocity in money could blow up in their face.”

 

Sinclair: “It can blow up in their face because money moving on fear will only make a move once. Velocity of money requires that the money be moved multiple times, and deal with items of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

 

Items of Gross Domestic Product are all that is measured in the velocity of money, and running money from an account and into gold isn’t going to have any impact on velocity of money except to make it disappear. It will be hidden because it will be running from fear of confiscation. That’s a fact. It will take the velocity of money straight to the floor, followed by a crisis of confidence that would then take the velocity of money to historic highs or global hyperinflation.

 

But global hyperinflation in these circumstances will only develop out of a significant, if not total loss of confidence in the US dollar. When the US Dollar Index is back under .72 the world will be flirting with hyperinflation. It’s all about confidence.”

 

Eric King: “How do central planners maneuver on the chess board going forward when any misstep can result in tremendous destruction or hyperinflation?”

 

Sinclair: “You would think the answer to that would be extremely carefully. But those who are in power have tremendous egos, and in the case of Mrs. Lagarde, seem not to be in control.

 

So what we have been talking about is a breakdown amongst central planners. This is the downside of globalism. Everybody affects everybody else in the Western financial world, and what we have just witnessed is a horrendous misstep in the parade of central planners.

 


 

 

When you see that Lagarde, the European Union and Monetary Commissioner Olli Rehn, as well as others are backpedaling, it means that there is division. It means that they may have stepped out of order and everybody is not in agreement. This also reveals a major chink in the armor of central planners and clearly shows they are overrated, and maybe critically overrated.

 

I guarantee you these people don’t have a clue in hell as to how to proceed from here. But Bernanke and Draghi want to keep what they have bought. They went into the store of globalism and spent trillions of dollars, but they did buy confidence in bank deposits.

 

If they feel that confidence in bank deposits is seriously challenged, they want out. They spent trillions of dollars to buy confidence in the financial system. If Cyprus is an outline of future plans and activities, then all of that money will have been wasted because confidence will in fact be destroyed.

 

If the major theft of bank deposits is repeated at any point in the future it will happen without any warning and it will happen over a weekend. Meaning, on Monday morning US and Canadian accounts will be hit and people in North America will simply be shocked that their wealth has been stolen.”




Sunday, March 31, 2013

If You Don't Believe Me....

If You Don't Believe Me....

Posted 2013-03-31 18:01
by Karl Denninger

Ignore this thread
If You Don't Believe Me....
... perhaps you will believe Mr. Stockman, former Reagan Budget Director.
While the Fed fiddles, Congress burns. Self-titled fiscal hawks like Paul D. Ryan, the chairman of the House Budget Committee, are terrified of telling the truth: that the 10-year deficit is actually $15 trillion to $20 trillion, far larger than the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of $7 trillion. Its latest forecast, which imagines 16.4 million new jobs in the next decade, compared with only 2.5 million in the last 10 years, is only one of the more extreme examples of Washington’s delusions.
Yep. And yet the solution to this problem in the intermediate and longer term is not all that complicated -- garrote the medical industry.

This is not difficult to figure out from the facts on where the money is going. It is also not difficult to figure out what's going to happen if we don't cut that crap out. Virtually the entire problem is found in just two programs, one of which is Social Security and the other is Medical entitlements.
Social Security's biggest problem is in fact disability, which is massively overstuffed and must be fixed. The actual pension plan is reasonably close to actuarial soundness and by indexing the full retirement age to longevity it would be ok. In about 20-30 years its expenses will begin to decline naturally.
If we do not resolve this problem within the next couple of years we are finished as a nation.
These policies have brought America to an end-stage metastasis. The way out would be so radical it can’t happen. It would necessitate a sweeping divorce of the state and the market economy. It would require a renunciation of crony capitalism and its first cousin: Keynesian economics in all its forms. The state would need to get out of the business of imperial hubris, economic uplift and social insurance and shift its focus to managing and financing an effective, affordable, means-tested safety net.
Yep.
And we do not have much time either, because the laws of arithmetic set forth exactly what is going to happen if we do not act, and the longer we wait the worse the damage will be.
Discussion below (registration required to post)

 

Saturday, March 30, 2013

Video: Planned Parenthood Official Argues for Right to Post-Birth Abortion

Video: Planned Parenthood Official Argues for Right to Post-Birth Abortion

http://www.infowars.com/video-planned-parenthood-official-argues-for-right-to-post-birth-abortion-2/

Florida legislators considering a bill to require abortionists to provide medical care to an infant who survives an abortion were shocked during a committee hearing this week when a Planned Parenthood official endorsed a right to post-birth abortion.
Alisa LaPolt Snow, the lobbyist representing the Florida Alliance of Planned Parenthood Affiliates, testified that her organization believes the decision to kill an infant who survives a failed abortion should be left up to the woman seeking an abortion and her abortion doctor.

Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Bellas Q Tique - beautiful quality children's clothes and accessories...

Deport Canadian Citizen Jim Carrey for Attacking 2nd Amendment: Stop attacking American 2nd Amendment and move back to Canada.

Yes, Hitler really did take the guns from Jews before throwing them into concentration camps (or gas chambers)

Yes, Hitler really did take the guns from Jews before throwing them into concentration camps (or gas chambers)

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039630_Hitler_history_gun_control.html#ixzz2OfVlG6c5

 They say those who learn nothing from history are doomed to repeat it, but then again, sometimes repeating history is exactly the point, as longtime anti-gun Sen. Dianne Feinstein's new "assault weapons ban" planned legislation for early next year proves.

Feinstein, a California Democrat, was instrumental in enacting a similar piece of legislation in 1994; with the help of President Clinton and Democratic majorities in both Houses of Congress, that ban lasted a decade before being allowed to expire by a Republican-controlled Congress in 2004.

But her current measure would go much further and, in many ways, actually mirrors anti-gun measures enacted nearly 75 years ago by Nazi leader Adolph Hitler, in a bid to disarm a particular ethnic group he loathed.


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039630_Hitler_history_gun_control.html#ixzz2OfVzFI5A

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

CIA developed a sudden cancer gun back in the 1970s

CIA developed a sudden cancer gun back in the 1970s

MR. CHAVEZ HAD CLAIMED THAT THE CIA HAD TARGETED HIM AND GAVE HIM CANCER...INTERESTING LINK

Kurt Nimmo
March 6, 2013

For the naysayers who dispute that the CIA was responsible for the cancer death of Hugo Chavez, note the device in the following video. It is a dart gun developed in the 1970s (or possibly earlier) by the CIA.

In the video, the weapon is described as inducing heart attacks. Cancer is not mentioned. However, we know that the CIA used Dr. Alton Oschner, the former president of the American Cancer Society, to run covert cancer research for the agency.
It is, however, more than merely coincidental that a significant number of South American leaders have died from cancer.
Charles Kong Soo writes:
It was a case destined for the X-Files and conspiracy theorists alike, when Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez speculated that the US might have developed a way to weaponize cancer, after several Latin American leaders were diagnosed with the disease. The list includes former Argentine president, Nestor Kirchner (colon cancer) Brazil’s president Dilma Rousseff (lymphoma cancer), her predecessor Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (throat cancer), Chavez (undisclosed), former Cuban president Fidel Castro (stomach cancer) Bolivian president, Evo Morales (nasal cancer) and Paraguayan president Fernando Lugo (lymphoma cancer). What do they have in common besides cancer? All of them are left-wing leaders. Coincidence?
Additional victims may include pan-Africanist Kwame Ture, Jamaica’s reggae musician Bob Marley and Dominican Prime Minister Rosie Douglas.
And there is Jack Ruby, the man who shot Lee Harvey Oswald. Ruby died from lung cancer in 1967. “What was strange was the cancer cells were not the type that originate in the respiratory system,” Soo notes. “He told his family that he was injected with cancer cells in prison when he was treated with shots for a cold. He died just before he was to testify before Congress.”
If you think government does not engage in wholesale murder to silence critics and opponents, consider the murder of Alexander Litvinenko, the former Russian Federal Security Service officer who died in London after drinking tea laced with polonium-210. It is widely believed Litvinenk, who was seeking political asylum, was killed by the Russian government.
Communists are known to have assassinated dissidents with the “Bulgarian umbrella,” a pneumatic device that shot a small poisonous pellet containing ricin. It is widely believed Bulgarian dissident writer Georgi Markov was murdered in London with the weapon in 1978. It was also allegedly used in the botched assassination attempt against the Bulgarian dissident journalist Vladimir Kostov in Paris. It is said the Bulgarian Secret Service collaborated with the Soviet KGB to kill the dissidents.

This article was posted: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 at 5:20 pm

Our Disintegrating Government

Our Disintegrating Government

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=218430

There's only way to look at this folks.
WASHINGTON — Attorney General Eric Holder's stunning admission that it was difficult to prosecute large banks because of the potential economic impact may be a turning point of the drive to break them up.
It's not stunning at all.
It is, however, an admission of what we have known for years.
And it's something that the Congress and Administration had better fix -- right now.
The Rule of Law works and guides a just society only because it applies to everyone.
Nobody gets to rape, rob, pillage or murder. If you do, no matter who you are, you face the same punishment, the same process, the same sentence.
We all know there are disparities in the process and always have been. But there's a difference between the foibles of mankind -- everyone has their bias, and there is no such thing as a human process that is flawless -- and intentional, designed-in or willful refusal to prosecute certain people for acts that land others in prison.
The latter is the defining action of a dictatorship.
A dictatorship can only exist by declaring war upon the people. When a certain subset of the population is given license to pillage or worse that is the very definition of "diktat" from which the term "dictatorship" comes.
Fast and Furious, incidentally, falls into this category as well.
This is an extraordinarily dangerous state of affairs and must not be permitted to continue. The government and its actors have lost all moral and ethical appeal to fair play and the rule of law -- by exempting certain people they have declared both themselves and those they exempted beyond the protections that exist in a civilized society.
I doubt Eric Holder realizes what happened in that hearing room or how clearly he rang the bell, but there is now a gauntlet before both the Administration and Congress that they have laid at their own feet. Coupled with Rand Paul's filibuster over one simple question -- the murder of non-belligerent Americans on American soil without due process of law, without charge, without trial, we have a truly historical pair of events -- and unfortunately they're not the sort of historical events you wish to witness.
This is in fact arguably the most-serious Constitutional Crisis that has occurred in decades, although it is not yet ripe and likely won't be for some time.
That it will ripen and then rot, however, if left unaddressed is a matter of historical fact and certainty.
I pray for our nation; this is not what I wanted to hear today.

Thursday, February 28, 2013

Life Hope & Truth

Life Hope & Truth

God: Do You Really Know Him?

Does God exist? If so, who and what is He? These questions are too important for blind belief or scoffing dismissal. You can know, and you can know Him!

Throughout history people have contemplated the possibility of supernatural beings who hold the keys to the mysteries of life.
Is there a God? Can we prove His existence? If He does exist, why did He create us? Why doesn’t He make Himself so obvious that no one could doubt Him?
What is He like? Can we understand Him? Is He in some ways like us, or is He completely incomprehensible to us mere mortals?
Does He care for us? Does He want to have a relationship with us? What does He expect from us?
The Bible claims to be a book written for us by the great Creator God. In it are answers to all of these questions and much more. It is like an instruction book for God’s human creation, and it tells us what we need to know to approach God and really get to know Him. The articles in this section give you a peek into that wonderful truth that gives true hope to our lives.

Read More: Life Hope & Truth

Sarah Palin: Feds Are Stockpiling Bullets For Civil Unrest

Sarah Palin: Feds Are Stockpiling Bullets For Civil Unrest

Sarah Palin: Feds Are Stockpiling Bullets For Civil Unrest
  • The Alex Jones ChannelAlex Jones Show podcastPrison Planet TVInfowars.com TwitterAlex Jones' FacebookInfowars store
Former Governor warns America is “finished” if it cannot resolve debt problem

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
February 28, 2013
Former Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin has warned that the federal government is “stockpiling bullets” in preparation for “civil unrest,” adding that America is “finished” if it cannot deal with its debt problem.
Sarah Palin. Image: Wikimedia Commons
Writing on her official Facebook page, Palin remarked, “If we are going to wet our proverbial pants over 0.3% in annual spending cuts when we’re running up trillion dollar annual deficits, then we’re done. Put a fork in us. We’re finished. We’re going to default eventually and that’s why the feds are stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest.”
The post achieved nearly 12,000 ‘shares,’ attracting nearly 60,000 ‘likes’ and over 4500 comments.
The Department of Homeland Security has committed to purchasing around 2 billion bullets over the course of the last year, in addition to buying 7,000 fully automatic assault rifles last September (the agency referred to them as “personal defense weapons”).
Although the mainstream media has played down the purchases as the feds merely saving money by buying in bulk, the ammo buys have contributed to shortages across the country.
However, concerns were further stoked last week when Law Enforcement Targets Inc, a DHS contractor that supplies shooting targets to the agency along with thousands of police departments, was forced to apologize for producing “non-traditional threat” targets which featured images of pregnant women, children and elderly gun owners in residential settings.
Politico published an article following Palin’s Facebook post bizarrely claiming that her concerns about the federal government purchasing ammo in large quantities had been debunked despite admitting that “government agencies are, in fact, purchasing large amounts of ammunition.” This tactic of admitting that the government is purchasing a huge number of bullets while simultaneously portraying anyone concerned about the fact as erroneous and paranoid has been adopted by other mainstream media outlets like the Washington Post, who have blithely accepted and regurgitated the government’s explanation that the bullets are merely for target practice.
The DHS has also been busy buying large supplies of body armor, leading to more shortages. Last year, the agency put out an urgent order for “riot gear” in anticipation of civil unrest. The agency has also ordered bullet-proof checkpoint booths and hired hundreds of new security guards to protect government buildings over the course of the last 12 months.
Palin making the connection between the federal government’s arms build-up and America’s economic decline is noteworthy given how other countries have experienced domestic disorder in the aftermath of financial turmoil in recent years.
As we explained in a recent article, generating mass social dislocation has been an admitted tool used by the World Bank and the IMF to create the necessary chaos to loot major economies.
As respected investigative reporter Greg Palast exposed in 2001, the World Bank and the IMF have honed a technique that has allowed them to asset-strip numerous other countries in the past – that technique has come to be known at the “IMF riot,” a process of scaring off investors and causing government bankruptcies by fostering unrest.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

This article was posted: Thursday, February 28, 2013 at 9:53 am

Saturday, February 23, 2013

It is Starting: Florida doesn't have enough doctors for Medicaid expansion

It is Starting: Florida doesn't have enough doctors for Medicaid expansion

TALLAHASSEE, FL

 Brace yourself for longer lines at the doctor's office.

Whether you're employed and insured, elderly and on Medicare, or poor and covered by Medicaid, the Florida Medical Association says there's a growing shortage of doctors — especially specialists — available to provide you with medical care.
And if the Florida Legislature goes along with Gov. Rick Scott's recommendation to offer Medicaid coverage to an additional 1 million Floridians — part of the Affordable Care Act that takes effect next January — the FMA says that shortage will only get worse

Bottom Line: Why We Must Stop Deficits NOW

Bottom Line: Why We Must Stop Deficits NOW

These are the major spending items in the US Budget, from 1980 to today. I am ignoring all the ones that don't matter, and I'm also intentionally leaving in one foil often used by both sides of the debate for scale purposes (Education.)
Of particular interest (and alarm) is Welfare, which doubled from 2007 to 2010. But -- it appears to have come down some in the least two years and change. Therefore, while this is a problem, it is not the emergent one.
Those are the three categories on the top -- Pensions (Social Security, mostly), Health Care and Defense.
One of them is discontinuous -- Defense. It is possible that the rough tripling from roughly 1998 to today has stopped. If so then its impact on what is to come is not material.
Before you protest, please read the rest of this.
That leaves two categories -- "Pensions" and "Health Care".
Note the right scale graph, the purple dashed line. This is the reason that the so-called pundits, from Bernanke on down, all argue that we must deal with this sometime in the reasonable future, but right now we're not about to hit the wall. That is, GDP is rising in rough conformance with those three major contributors to the government's spending profile. And it is GDP (in one form or another) upon which all taxes are levied. Therefore, by first appearance, they argue, we are not about to have an imminent crack-up.
They're wrong.
Note the category called "interest" and that it has been rising much slower that has the debt over the last few years. It tracked the debt growth until approximately 1996.
This is when active manipulation took hold by both The Fed and Government.
It is when, approximately, we transferred from growth in the economy to debt-financing for consumption.
Now I want to project out a few other assumptions just a couple of years.
First, I will project forward both Pensions and Health Care to 2015, along with the Debt.

Friday, February 22, 2013

How to Keep the Sabbath - Life, Hope & Truth

How to Keep the Sabbath - Life, Hope & Truth

White Rose: The Germans who tried to topple Hitler

White Rose: The Germans who tried to topple Hitler


Lilo Furst-Ramdohr in 1942 - and today (picture: Domenic Saller)


Seventy years ago today, three German students were executed in Munich for leading a resistance movement against Hitler. Since then, the members of the White Rose group have become German national heroes - Lilo Furst-Ramdohr was one of them.

In 1943, World War II was at its height - but in Munich, the centre of Nazi power, a group of students had started a campaign of passive resistance.

Liselotte Furst-Ramdohr, already a widow at the age of 29 following her husband's death on the Russian front, was introduced to the White Rose group by her friend, Alexander Schmorell.

"I can still see Alex today as he told me about it," says Furst-Ramdohr, now a spry 99-year-old. "He never said the word 'resistance', he just said that the war was dreadful, with the battles and so many people dying, and that Hitler was a megalomaniac, and so they had to do something."


What was the White Rose?


Hans and Sophie Scholl, members of the White Rose resistance group

  • Resistance group formed in 1942 by group of Munich University students and their professor
  • Horrified by Nazism, they wrote and distributed leaflets urging Germans to oppose Hitler's regime
  • Also painted anti-Nazi slogans on buildings around Munich
  • Produced six leaflets before their arrest


Schmorell and his friends Christoph Probst and Hans Scholl had started writing leaflets encouraging Germans to join them in resisting the Nazi regime.

With the help of a small group of collaborators, they distributed the leaflets to addresses selected at random from the phone book.

Furst-Ramdohr says the group couldn't understand how the German people had been so easily led into supporting the Nazi Party and its ideology.

"They must have been able to tell how bad things were, it was ridiculous," she says.

The White Rose delivered the leaflets by hand to addresses in the Munich area, and sent them to other cities through trusted couriers.

Furst-Ramdohr never delivered the leaflets herself but hid them in a broom cupboard in her flat.

She also helped Schmorell make stencils in her flat saying "Down with Hitler", and on the nights of 8 and 15 February, the White Rose graffitied the slogan on walls across Munich.

Furst-Ramdohr remembers the activists - who were risking their lives for their beliefs - as young and naive.

One of the best-known members of the group today is Hans Scholl's younger sister Sophie, later the subject of an Oscar-nominated film, Sophie Scholl: The Final Days. Furst-Ramdohr remembers that Sophie was so scared that she used to sleep in her brother's bed.


'Fight against the Party!'

The sixth leaflet produced by the White Rose was smuggled out of the country and scattered over Germany by Allied planes.
The day of reckoning has come, the reckoning of German youth with the most repellent tyranny our nation has ever seen...
For us there is only one slogan: Fight against the Party! Get out of the party hierarchy, which wants to keep us silent!
The German name will be dishonoured forever if German youth does not rise up, to revenge and atone at once, to destroy their tormentors and build up a new spiritual Europe. Students! The German nation looks to us!
Translation: Lucy Burns


"Hans was very afraid too, but they wanted to keep going for Germany - they loved their country," she says.

On 18 February, Hans and Sophie Scholl set off on their most daring expedition yet. They planned to distribute copies of their sixth - and as it would turn out, final - leaflet at the University of Munich, where students would find them as they came out of lectures.

The siblings left piles of the leaflets around the central stairwell. But as they reached the top of the stairs, Sophie still had a number of leaflets left over - so she threw them over the balcony, to float down to the students below.

She was seen by a caretaker, who called the Gestapo. Hans Scholl had a draft for another leaflet in his pocket, which he attempted to swallow, but the Gestapo were too quick.

The Scholl siblings were arrested and tried in front of an emergency session of the People's Court. They were found guilty and executed by guillotine, along with their friend and collaborator Christoph Probst, on 22 February 1943.

Hans Scholl's last words before he was executed were: "Long live freedom!"

A copy of the sentences against members of the White Rose at the Munich district court The Scholls were tried at the People's Court of Law, now Munich's district court

The rest of the White Rose group was thrown into panic. Alexander Schmorell went straight to Lilo Forst-Ramdohr's flat, where she helped him find new clothes and a fake passport. Schmorell attempted to flee to Switzerland but was forced to turn back by heavy snow.

Returning to Munich, he was captured after a former girlfriend recognised him entering an air raid shelter during a bombing raid. He was arrested, and later executed.

Lilo Furst-Ramdohr was herself arrested on 2 March. "Two Gestapo men came to the flat and they turned everything upside down," she says.

"They went through my letters, and then one of them said 'I'm afraid you'll have to come with us'.

"They took me to the Gestapo prison in the Wittelsbach Palais on the tram - they stood behind my seat so I couldn't escape."


Find out more


Sophie Scholl's grave
Lucy Burns interviewed Liselotte Furst-Ramdohr for the BBC World Service programme Witness


Furst-Ramdohr spent a month in Gestapo custody. She was regularly interrogated about her role in the White Rose, but eventually released without charge - a stroke of luck she puts down to her status as a war widow, and to the likelihood that the Gestapo was hoping she would lead them to other co-conspirators. After her release she was followed by the secret police for some time.

She then fled Munich for Aschersleben, near Leipzig, where she married again and opened a puppet theatre.

The final White Rose leaflet was smuggled out of Germany and intercepted by Allied forces, with the result that, in the autumn of 1943, millions of copies were dropped over Germany by Allied aircraft.

Since the end of the war, the members of the White Rose have become celebrated figures, as German society has searched for positive role models from the Nazi period.

But Furst-Ramdohr doesn't like it. "At the time, they'd have had us all executed," she says of the majority of her compatriots.

She now lives alone in a small town outside Munich, where she continued to give dancing lessons up to the age of 86.

Her friend Alexander Schmorell was made a saint by the Russian Orthodox church in 2012.

"He would have laughed out loud if he'd known," says Furst-Ramdohr. "He wasn't a saint - he was just a normal person."

Lucy Burns interviewed Liselotte Furst-Ramdohr for the BBC World Service programme Witness. Listen via BBC iPlayer or browse the Witness podcast archive.

You can follow the Magazine on Twitter and on Facebook

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Amazing Drone Technology

Amazing Drone Technology

Death from a swarm of tiny drones: U.S. Air Force releases terrifying video of tiny flybots that can can hover, stalk and even kill targets

  • Air Vehicles Directorate at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio, is already developing prototypes of tiny drones that can hover
  • The Micro Air Vehicles will work in swarms to provide complex surveillance of a battlefield
  • They can also be armed with incapacitating chemicals, combustible payloads or even explosives 'for precision targeting capability'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2281403/U-S-Air-Force-developing-terrifying-swarms-tiny-unmanned-drones-hover-crawl-kill-targets.html#ixzz2LVFMKl3o

Here IT Comes - The Fed Knows...

Here IT Comes - The Fed Knows...

THE RECOGNITION THAT THIS PATH WON'T WORK BECAUSE IT CAN'T BY THE MARKET HAS BEGUN. IT HAS BEEN SERIALLY RUN TWICE PREVIOUSLY WITH THE INTERNET AND HOUSING BUBBLES AND HAS SERIALLY FAILED TWICE! EVERYONE INVOLVED IN DOING IT, FROM THE PRESIDENT TO CONGRESS TO THE FED, KNOWS DAMN WELL THAT IT WON'T WORK BECAUSE IT HAS NOT IN THE PAST -- ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD -- EVER, BECAUSE IT CAN'T.
You're seeing the start of what happened in the early part of 2007, and rather than address this head-on our government is going to the exactly wrong thing and refuse to address it, and as a consequence we're going to get another collapse into already-depressed and therefore non-functional intervention capacity on the part of government and The Fed.

Read More:    Here IT Comes - The Fed Knows...

Interesting Sites to Checkout

Blog Archive