E-mail From BarackObama.com: Anyone Opposing Late-Term Abortions Is Sexist

E-mail From BarackObama.com: Anyone Opposing Late-Term Abortions Is Sexist

Organizing For Action refers to proposed late-term abortion ban as latest in “anti-women strategy”

Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
November 8, 2013

A pro-Obama “grassroots” organization sent out a mass e-mail from info@barackobama.com today, which practically accuses anyone who supports a ban on late-term abortions as being sexist.

An ultrasound of a baby at 12 weeks and six days. Credit: Wolfgang Moroder via Wikipedia.

Organizing For Action, a non-profit created out of Obama’s 2012 campaign operation and described as “grassroots” even though it is based in Washington, D.C., wrote the e-mail in response to a citizen-initiated ordinance in Albuquerque, N.M. to ban abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy.

“Voters will cast ballots on November 19th on an initiative that would ban abortions after 20 weeks with virtually zero exceptions,” the e-mail from info@barackobama.com read. “This is a serious attack on women — and it’s a deliberate attempt by extreme interest groups to test their latest anti-women strategy.”

The e-mail directs readers to barackobama.com, which the group maintains.

The organization is essentially labeling anyone who is against abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy, in which the baby begins to grow hair and can even react to loud sounds, as being sexist.

But what about women who are against late-term abortions? Under this logic, wouldn’t they be considered “anti-woman?”

This false labeling follows the trend by the establishment to describe anyone who is against Obama’s unconstitutional policies as being “racist.”

Back in September, Hollywood actor Ed Asner said that many celebrities were afraid of being called “racist” if they stood up against Obama’s demand for war in Syria.

“A lot of people don’t want to feel anti-black by being opposed to Obama,” he told the Hollywood Reporter.

One celebrity, James Woods, did openly criticize Obama on a variety of issues but also admitted that he was likely sacrificing his acting career in order to do so.

Some gun grabbers are even attempting to call all gun owners “racists.”

The establishment and its supporters are falsely labeling anyone opposed to their policies as “sexist” and “racist” in an effort to suppress resistance to their agenda.

This tactic is designed to make Americans too afraid to stand up for what they believe in.

This article was posted: Friday, November 8, 2013 at 3:13 pm

I LOVE MY CHICKEN !

LOVE MY CHICKEN !!

WATCH VIDEO


LOVE MY CHICKEN !!


A CLASSIC!

Shock: Fox News Airs Bombshell Report On GMO Food

Shock: Fox News Airs Bombshell Report On GMO Food

Mikael Thalen
Infowars.com
November 3, 2013

During Saturday’s “A Healthy You & Carol Alt,” a new half-hour Fox News show covering health and wellness, organic health commentator Max Goldberg joined the program to break down what may be one of the most hard-hitting GMO reports ever aired by the mainstream media.

“No long-term studies have ever been done on humans, but when you look at the studies that have been done on animals, it’s pretty appalling,” Goldberg said. “You’re talking about liver damage and kidney damage and when they fed it to hamsters, the third generation of hamsters weren’t able to produce babies, so there’s real safety issues.”

As mentioned, a 2007 study published in the journal Archives of Environmental Contamination and Technology showed that rats fed Monsanto’s MON863 corn for more than 90 days began to show “signs of toxicity” in the liver and kidneys.

In 2010, Russian biologist Alexey V. Surov released the results of a study testing the effects of Monsanto’s genetically modified soy on hamsters. After monitoring three generations over a two year period, third generation hamsters not only lost the ability to reproduce, but even began growing hair inside their mouths.

“The real big issue in our country Carol, is that genetically modified food’s are not labeled, so people do not know that they are eating genetically modified foods. Over 60 countries around the world require GMOs to be labeled but the US does not,” Goldberg added. “And why is that? According to the Food & Water Watch, the Ag-Bio tech industry, which owns all these GMOs, has spent $572 million on campaign contributions and lobbying to make sure that they don’t get labeled.”

The report goes on to cover the nation’s 93 percent labeling approval rating, the biotech industry’s defeat of California’s labeling Proposition 37, as well as the current attempt to stop I-522 in Washington state, where a lawsuit by the state’s attorney general just revealed the 34 corporations laundering donation money to hide their opposition to GMO labeling from the public.

Coming from a network that once fired two journalists for attempting to report Canadian studies linking Monsanto’s rBGH-tainted milk to cancer, the move not only represents the public’s continued shift against GMOs, but the media’s desperate attempt to remain relevant to a public hungry for truthful information.

This post originally appeared at Story Leak

This article was posted: Sunday, November 3, 2013 at 6:36 am

Tags: gmo